Iraq War and Internation Relation Paradigms Essay

Iraq War and Internation Relation Paradigms - prove ExampleBefore delving into the paradigms, it is necessary to refresh the facts leading up to this study. In the aftermath of World exchange Center collapse in September 2001, Bush found a path to reach galore(postnominal) parts of the creative activity for various reasons that were presented to the Congress and the public, but not favored by the majority overall. The nearly significant impact was on Iraq because the war is still in progress. The question is still inevitable as to why the Bush administration chose Iraq to invade. In his State of the Union Message, Bush commented, Iraqs illegal weapons programs, its attempts to hide those weapons from inspectors, and its link to terrorist groups, (Bushs Deep Reasons for War on Iraq) referring to Saddams underground activities. There catch been no terrorists arrests in Iraq and in October, Duelfer released a preliminary report finding that in March 2003 - the month of invasion-S addam did not have any weapons of chaw end (WMD) stockpiles and had not started any program to produce them (Official U.S. Calls off Search for Iraqi WMDs). This arouses suspicions thusly behind the real reason for the Bush Administration to invade Iraq. ... The same concept should then be applied when dealing with other countries. Without having actual evidence, declaring a war on a country is not the mark of a respected authority. As America was intensifying its attacks on Iraq, newton Korea came forward and admitted to having thermonuclear weapons. North Korea does have missile and biological and chemical weapons programs, along with its bid for a nuclear option - and all have been significantly improven in the past decade (Encarnacion 2005) Then why not invade North Korea To believe that America invaded Iraq partly based on a nuclear threat to the rest of the world seems absurd then and even now, since North Korea was openly admitting to having nuclear weapons and no direct military fill was taken in their regard. Then what is it that makes Iraq, and it is crucial to once again reiterate that no weapons of mass destruction were really found, the main target of the Bush AdministrationImperialism-Is America Building a New pudding stoneThroughout history, many superpowers have built vast conglomerates through imperialism such as the Turks Ottoman pudding stone and the British Empire. Yet, America has never shown fondness in the concept of imperialism and neither has invaded and conquered a country to pass water an empire. However, with the recent political activities, suspicions do arise to question the intentionality of the Bush Administration. If Iraq was attacked to search for weapons of mass destruction and those accusations proved to be false, then why has the war not ended Is America now building an empireFirst, a definition of imperialism is essential to establish the foundation on which to judge the governments actions. Imperialism is basical ly when one